In recent weeks, the back-to-back state visits to Beijing by Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump have put China in the global spotlight.
For some international analysts, the summits showcased China as a “stabilising force capable of hosting two major rivals within days”, a “broker between the big powers” and a “pillar of global stability”.
To others, the visits highlighted how China is becoming an “indispensable global power” and President Xi Jinping a “world leader to be reckoned with and courted”.
Chinese analysts, meanwhile, noted that over the past six months, numerous other world leaders have visited Beijing, including those from France, Britain, Canada, South Korea and Germany.
It was the first visit in eight years by a UK prime minister, for example.
And the first visit in nine years for a Canadian, South Korean and American leader.
With all these visits happening one after another, Chinese media described the Chinese capital as an international “living room” that provides stability in a turbulent world.
Another headline read, “The world is entering “Beijing time“.
While this has undeniably been a big moment on the global stage for Beijing, these interpretations miss three important points.
First, it is unclear whether world leaders are visiting China because of proactive Chinese diplomacy or as a way of gaining leverage in dealings with the Trump administration.
For example, when Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney visited Beijing in January, it was widely interpreted as a response to Canada’s structural dependence on the US and the volatility of the second Trump administration.
Some media said he was playing the "China card” to negotiate better terms with the US.
